A new Nature Cancer study explores whether AI can safely step into one of healthcare’s most critical workflows: breast cancer screening.

A recent experiment by researchers at the University of Gothenburg shows how quickly false data can enter the narrative.

Many organisations have realised that the missing piece in their AI jigsaw is the knowledge and understanding in their employees heads.

Evan Spiegal, CEO of SNAP announced 1,000 jobs gone (16% of staff), $500 million stripped out of the cost base, and a repeated insistence that this is not panic but precision.

Allbirds, once a poster child for ethical consumerism, merino wool minimalism and B‑Corp virtue calmly announced it has sold its shoes, its brand and, effectively, its former self this week to become NewBird AI, a GPU‑as‑a‑Service operation armed with $50 million of convertible financing.

Stanford issued their 2026 AI Index recently, a full 423 pages of AI related data, from attendance at AI conferences, AI patents by geography to Human vs AI performance benchmarks.

Last month, Anthropic, the developer of Claude did something unusual for Silicon Valley and hosted a two‑day moral summit.

Constraints drive behaviour.

The researchers at Oxford researchers have developed an AI tool that can predict heart failure at least five years before it clinically develops, using routine cardiac CT scans already performed in the UK's National Health Service (NHS).

Gallup’s latest research exposes a growing AI adoption gap inside organisations where AI tools are already available.

Their intent is to embed mandatory ethical governance into AI activities conducted in China, where it may pose risks to Human Dignity, Public Order, Life and Heath, Privacy and Data Security, Social Fairness or Sustainable Development.

One that will 'prepare democratic societies for the transiition towards superintelligence'.

The NY Attorney General, Letitia James, issued a consumer alert last week (on April 1, but not an Aprils Fool) to remind tax payers of the AI driven scams that they may fall foul of.

This is the question that The New Yorker asked in their latest investigative article.

One that will open doors to more accurate neuroscience research and an understanding of how cognition works.

When you realise you have deleted (with no backup) the project you have been working on, and there is no way back.

... and talk to a Victorian. Someone who thinks Darwin is a disruptive thinker, and who is experiencing the Railways as a new transport method.

In a recently published article in Science, reasarchers studied AI “sycophancy”, or the tendency of large language models (LLMs) to excessively agree with, flatter, or validate users, even when the user’s behavior is unethical, harmful, or socially inappropriate.

Extreme political views and negative feelings towards others who disagree politically have become a threat to current democracies.

What do you do if you are an AI Agent and you need a human to do a physical task for you?