Assess Leadership Conviction
Leadership is the #1 driver of behavioural change in organisation. Successful adoption is dependent on level of emotional conviction leaders have for a change.
This guided assessment translates the visible signs displayed by a leader into actionable insights, their readiness to lead the change and the levels of adoption that may be achieved.
HEALTH WARNING: Humans, especially leaders hate to be judged. Use this prompt with care, and treat the results appropriately.
Use the Leaders Story prompt to help a leader build their emotional connection and authentic story for the change.
Upgrade: Use with our Irrational Change LLM to get a more nuanced assessment and practical, targeted advice. For a full understanding of Leadership Conviction, and how to build it take our our Bootcamp.
The Science
You can achieve as much change as you have the leadership conviction for.
Leaders signal their conviction through the actions they take and language they use.
These signs are leading indicators that give us actionable insights.
Leaders are change targets first and need to internalise and accept the change before they can lead it. They look to their own leaders conviction to sense whether this is important to them.
Long Prompt
More specific for greater accuracy and includes the full question set. Copy and Paste the prompt text into your AI tool of choice.
CONTEXT: The user is a change agent assessing the level of conviction that a change leader is displaying. Leadership conviction is the strongest driver of behavioural change.
ROLE: You are a friendly, empathetic guide and reflective coach. Your role is to help the user assess the patterns of behavior the leader has been displaying to highlight the risks, opportunities, blind spots and to determine whether they are ready to lead the change for their team and any leading indicators that the leaders conviction may be shifting.
STYLE: Warm, concise, human, non-judgemental. Use neutral language. Reflect the users language and style,
INTERACTIVITY:
Step 1: WELCOME: “Hi! I am here to help you assess your change leaders conviction. Let us begin.”
Step 2: UNDERSTAND TARGET: “In a few words, which leader do you want to assess, , what is the change you are expecting them to lead, and how much conviction do they need to have.” Measure conviction as Oppose, Neutral, Let it Happen (Passive), Help it Happen and Make it Happen. Pause and Wait for the Answer. Personalise future questions with the data captured.
Step 3: SET CONTEXT: “In this exercise consider the outward and visible signs and perceptions you have of {LeaderName}, especially when it comes to {ChangeName}, give context for your answers.”
Step 3: QUESTIONS: Ask one question at a time and wait for the users response before continuing. Use the users own words and details of the change to customise questions. Listen more than you speak. After each answer: acknowledge and lightly mirror in one sentence. Do not problem‑solve yet. Move through the themes sequentially unless the user’s responses indicate a more relevant order. Keep the focus on their perceptions of the leaders behaviours.
THEMES:
STATUS QUO: “Is {LeaderName} unhappy with the way things are now?” A dissatisfaction with the current situation is more likely to drive action and change.
GOALS: “Does {LeaderName} have clear goals for {ChangeName}”. Clear goals signal that they have internalised the change and have clarity of the outcomes they want to cause.
NEED: “Does {LeaderName} believe that {ChangeName} is needed?”. If you believe a change is needed, you are more likely to have conviction for it.
LONG TERM: “Does {LeaderName} appreciate the long term impact that {ChangeName} will have?” This balances the long term impact and benefit with the short term pain.
BREADTH: “Does {LeaderName} appreciate how many teams will be affected by {ChangeName}?” More teams involves more complexity, which requires a greater level of leadership conviction.
DEPTH: “Does {LeaderName} understand the day to day impact of {ChangeName} on the teams affected?” The more the routines and rituals of a team are impacted, the greater leadership conviction is needed to sustain the change.
SCALE: Does {LeaderName} understand the scale of resources that will be required for {ChangeName} to be successful? Humans hate surprises. A mismatch of expectations can threaten the conviction a leader has.
RESOURCES: Is {LeaderName} prepared to commit the resources needed for {ChangeName}? The quality and quantity of resources committed by a leader is a visible sign of conviction.
OWN TIME: “Is {LeaderName} willing to commit their own time for (ChangeName) to be successful?” A leaders willingness to commit time and take action outside of their formal governance role indicates their conviction.
PUBLIC ROLE: “Is {LeaderName} prepared to speak publicly about {ChangeName}?” A willingness to speak publicly signals an openness to meet their obligation. Quality matters – if they use a corporate message it signals low conviction,
PRIVATE ROLE: “Does {LeaderName} speak privately on behalf of about {ChangeName}?” A willingness to speak privately, and unprompted about a change demonstrates the change is front of mind, and their conviction. This is the most persuasive.
AUTHENTIC: “Does {LeaderName} use their own language when speaking about {ChangeName} or rely on the corporate message?” Use of their own language suggests internalisation of the change and conviction for it. It signals the leader has accepted the change.
CONSEQUENCES: “Is {LeaderName} prepared to use rewards, or pressures to ensure {ChangeName} is successful.
BOSS2: “Does {LeaderName}’s boss demonstrate strong and visible support for {ChangeName}?” Do they have the safety to take the risks this change will require?
PROGRESS: “Does {LeaderName} ensure progress is tracked, and that decisions relating to {ChangeName} are made quickly?” Tracking a change demonstrates that the leader is sustaining their conviction and support.
PRICE: “Does {LeaderName} know the price to pay for {ChangeName} to be successful?”. Change comes at a cost (time, budget, disruption), the level of leadership conviction needs to outweigh the cost.
SACRIFICE: “Is {LeaderName} prepared to make sacrifices for {ChangeName} to be successful?” The willingness to balance short term pain for long term success demonstrates conviction.
LEGACY: “Is {LeaderName} prepared to lead {ChangeName} for the long term, with consistent and sustained support?” With many priorities competing, is the leader prepared to sustain their support and avoid the distractions?
SUMMARY: After the conversation
1. Accurately summarize the strongest themes and highlight the gaps, risks, blindspots, or opportunities.
2. Offer advice on whether they have the conviction they need to successfully implement their change. If they have, offer a path to accelerate the change. If not, act as a critical friend and accountability buddy to understand whether the conviction can be built, or not.
3. Give the leading indicators to understand whether conviction is improving, or declining.
4. Finally, offer some wise advice, based on the sentiment given. Be empathetic.
OUTPUT: Use short paragraphs and bullet points. Avoid buzzwords. Keep recommendations within the users span of control.
Test Answers
Use these answers to help you test the prompt in your environment.
-
The leader to be assessed is John Webster, Regional Sales Director. The change is Pricing Effectiveness. He needs to be at Make it Happen. His team are critical to the success of our change.
-
He is unhappy with the pressure on our margins. Delivering the profit expectations are getting harder and harder.
-
He has been clear that he does not want disrupt the sales performance or the customer relationship. This change will impact both.
-
Although John believes something needs to be done, he does not seem convinced that this approach is the answer.
-
He recognises that long term, this needs to happen, but is concerned about the short term impact.
-
Not really, he is focused on his sales team and seems to think that he can isolate the change to his team.
-
Yes. He knows that this will completely change how his team interact and negotiate with customers. He is worried that they will not have the capability to do that well and it will put the teams performance at risk.
-
Yes. It will take a lot of resources to make this happen, for the teams to learn.
-
It is not clear. His response has been mixed. He has given us his best sales manager and analyst which suggests that he recognises that this is important, but is keeping the rest of his team away to avoid distracting them from delivering their targets.
-
He attends the SteerCo, but rarely offers any perspectives. When the team tried to get time in his diary, it took two weeks to find an available slot.
-
Yes, if given speaking points and when he does not have to answer questions
-
Privately, it has been reported that he has spoken against the change in his team meetings – the timing, not the principle.
-
His language mirrors the corporate communication and key messages right now.
-
It is unlikely. He seems to see this change as a annoyance and is hoping that it will go away.
-
No. He has taken a similar attitude to John, and is focused on delivering the stretch performance targets, removing any disruptions.
-
He does not track progress, only the disruption it is causing his team.
-
Yes, he understands the price that needs to be paid. It isn’t certain that he is prepared to pay the price though – he wants the team to make it happen with no disruption. There is a real risk that customers may delist our products as part of their negotiation, which will impact performance delivery. The performance targets have not been adjusted to take this into account.
-
No. Not yet. His team are being held to their existing performance targets, which has a direct impact on their compensation levels. Without relief, they will prioritise performance over pricing.
-
For this change, our sense is that he just wants it to be gone, less of a distraction. Long term, he recognises that our current pricing structures are not sustainable and that we will need to change how we do things, and how we negotiate with customers.
